|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
 |
|
|
|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
|
|
|
|
(Ne)rozhodovanie o súlade ústavného zákona s ústavou (Non-)decision making on the conformity of the constitutional act with the constitution. Doc. JUDr. Boris Balog, PhD., Faculty of Law of Pan-European University Právny obzor, Volume 104, 2021, No. 2, pp. 99 – 115. Published online: 31.8.2021 https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2021.2.02 Abstract. The article provides a point of view of the regulation stipulating from 1 January 2021 that the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic does not decide on the conformity of a constitutional law with the constitution. This view is not from the position of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, as might be expected, but the article presents a view through the exercise of those powers of the National Council of the Slovak Republic that require a constitutional majority. The idea is to point out inflation, relativization and the fallacy of the constitutional majority. This exposes the core of the constitution to a threat against which there must be a protection in place in a democratic and legal state. Key words: National Council of the Slovak Republic, Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, material core of the Constitution, constitutional majority
|
ISSN 2729-9228 ISSN 0032-6984
|
|
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Ústav štátu a práva SAV | Ochrana osobných údajov | Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET |
