|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
 |
|
|
|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
|
|
|
|
Súbeh reivindikačného a odškodňovacieho nároku. Concurrence of re-vindication and compensation claim. JUDr. Milan Hlušák, PhD., Právnická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave. Právny obzor, 106, 2023, No. 3, pp. 177 – 188. Published online: 20.4.2023 https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2023.3.01 Abstract. In the paper the author deals with the possibility of concurrence of revindication and indemnification claims. Thus, whether, for example, in the case of theft of an object, the owner can claim damages against the thief, even if he could claim against the thief for the return of the object. The author concludes that this is possible. According to him, the damage may also consist in the mere retention of the thing, but only if it is a movable thing and the person retaining it is recklessly withholding it without a willingness to hand it over. The owner will therefore be able to make a claim for damages against him in such a case instead of a claim for replevin. In the author’s opinion, such an approach may help the owner of the movable thing by saving him from a two-round execution (if it is a substitutable thing), or two separate, successive main and execution proceedings (if it is a non-substitutable thing), since instead of having to wait for the result of the execution by taking the thing away, he can claim damages in the first main proceedings. Key words: concurrence of claims, vindication claim, compensation claim
|
ISSN 2729-9228 ISSN 0032-6984
|
|
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Ústav štátu a práva SAV. All rights reserved.Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET |
