|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
 |
|
|
|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
|
|
|
|
Interpretačné nejasnosti súvisiace s možnostou uzavretia zmieru v priestupkovom konaní (ešte jeden príspevok do diskusie). Interpretation unclear related to the possibility of conclusion of settlement in criminal proceedings (one more post for the discussion). JUDr. Lukáš Tomaš, Právnická fakulta UPJŠ v Košiciach Právny obzor, 106, 2023, No. 3, pp. 251 – 262. Published online: 20.4.2023 https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2023.3.06 Abstract. Slovak administrative punishment has long lacked comprehensive legal regulation, both from the point of view of substantive law and procedural law. This results in several interpretive ambiguities. One of the ambiguities in question is related to conciliation in misdemeanor proceedings. Some attention has already been paid to the issue of the possibility of conciliation in criminal proceedings in the current scientific literature. Scientific opinions on the possibilities of resolving a misdemeanor case through reconciliation, excluding the offense of defamation according to § 78 of the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 372/1990 Coll. on offenses as amended, are not uniform and differ. The aim of this contribution is to follow up on the currently produced scientific discourse in the subject area, to develop it substantively and ideologically, and to bring arguments in favor of the possibility of amicable disposal of several cases regulated by the tort law of public administration. Key words: administrative delict, administrative punishment, reconciliation, misdemeanor, administrative procedure
|
ISSN 2729-9228 ISSN 0032-6984
|
|
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Ústav štátu a práva SAV | Ochrana osobných údajov | Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET |
